linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: k210: remove an implicit 64-bit division

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 06 Mar 2023 14:48:33 -0800 (PST)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     sboyd@...nel.org
CC:     mr.bossman075@...il.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mr.Bossman075@...il.com, ustcymgu@...il.com, damien.lemoal@....com,
        mturquette@...libre.com, wbx@...nadk.org, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, lkp@...el.com
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: k210: remove an implicit 64-bit division

On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 14:41:11 PST (-0800), sboyd@...nel.org wrote:
> Quoting Jesse Taube (2023-02-28 16:26:55)
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>> 
>> The K210 clock driver depends on SOC_CANAAN, which is only selectable
>> when !MMU on RISC-V. !MMU is not possible on 32-bit yet, but patches
>> have been sent for its enabling. The kernel test robot reported this
>> implicit 64-bit division there.
>> 
>> Replace the implicit division with an explicit one.
>> 
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/202301201538.zNlqgE4L-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <Mr.Bossman075@...il.com>
>> ---
>
> Seems better to merge this one-liner earlier to unblock 32-bit.
>
> Applied to clk-fixes

Thanks!