lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 18:48:09 +0800
From:   Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     cw00.choi@...sung.com, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OPP: Simplify set_required_opp handling

Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> 于2023年2月27日周一 17:29写道:
>
> On 27-02-23, 17:21, Jun Nie wrote:
> > Sorry for not expressing it accurately. I should say devfreq devices
> > pointers, just
> > devfreq_virt_devs vs genpd_virt_devs. Then you know why I add devfreq-devs
> > dts nodes below.
>
> Won't something like dev_pm_opp_set_clkname() would be enough here too ? We
> already do this kind of work for clks and regulators.

Thanks! It is a possible solution. I will try to spare time on this as
higher priority tasks
are on my list.

>
> Having power domain specific information within CPU nodes isn't a requirement of
> the OPP core, but the general requirement of genpd core instead.
>
> --
> viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ