lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 21:32:08 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux.dev, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] iommu: Extend changing default domain to normal
 group

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:57:58AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The IOMMU group sysfs interface allows users to change the default
> domain of a group. The current implementation uses device_lock() to make
> sure that the devices in the group are not bound to any driver and won't
> be bound during the process of changing the default domain. In order to
> avoid a possible deadlock caused by lock order of device_lock and
> group->mutex, it limits the functionality to singleton groups only.
> 
> The recently implemented DMA ownership framework can be applied here to
> replace device_lock(). In addition, use group->mutex to ensure that the
> iommu ops of the device are always valid during the process of changing
> default domain.
> 
> With above replacement and enhancement, the device_lock() could be
> removed and the singleton-group-only limitation could be removed.
> 
> This series is based on v6.3-rc1 with below series from Robin applied,
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/cover.1674753627.git.robin.murphy@arm.com/

Joerg can you help Lu with patch planning here? Can we get Robin's
series, this one and a maybe few more that clash on this for the
cycle?

Should this one go before Robin's series? It didn't seem obviously
dependent beyond using the same helper function?

Thanks,
Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ