lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 18 Mar 2023 11:00:08 +0800
From:   Jacky Huang <ychuang570808@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        schung@...oton.com, Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Introduce Nuvoton ma35d1 SoC

Dear Arnd,


Thanks for you advice.


On 2023/3/17 下午 09:21, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023, at 07:30, Jacky Huang wrote:
>> On 2023/3/16 下午 10:05, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> Thank you very much for your kind help. You explained it so well,
>> I have understood the process. We got a lot of suggestions for this
>> patchset, and there are a lot of issues to fix. When most of the
>> problems get solved and acknowledged by the reviewers, I will
>> add you and soc@...nel.org to Cc.
> Ok, sounds good. Two more clarifications from me:
>
> 1. I expect you will have to go through two or three submissions
> that get more feedback before everyone is happy. Please include
> my arnd@...db.de on Cc on all the submissions, but only include
> the soc@...nel.org address when all patches have an Acked-by
> or Reviewed-by from the respective subsystem maintainer.


Sure, I will add you on Cc. Thank you.


> 2. I think the series looks very good at this point, and most of the
> feedback was about minor details, so I am optimistic that we can
> actually merge it soon.
>
> I only now saw that you had already submitted this several times
> at the beginning of last year, and this is technically 'v5'
> of the series, and it would make sense to add 'v6' to the subject
> next time and link back to the previous [1] and this[2] submission
> on lore.kernel.org.
>
>
>      Arnd
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220510032558.10304-1-ychuang3@nuvoton.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230315072902.9298-1-ychuang570808@gmail.com/


In fact, I was thinking about this before submitting the patch. Looks 
like this is causing

confusion for reviewers, so thanks for the suggestion. I will submit the 
next version as v6,

and add the history of v1 ~ v4, and this version will be regarded as v5.


Best regards,

Jacky Huang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ