linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] tools/nolibc: x86-64: Use `rep movsb` for `memcpy()` and `memmove()`

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 2 Sep 2023 13:11:06 +0700
From:   Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To:     Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@...weeb.org>
Cc:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Nicholas Rosenberg <inori@...x.org>,
        Michael William Jonathan <moe@...weeb.org>,
        GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] tools/nolibc: x86-64: Use `rep movsb` for
 `memcpy()` and `memmove()`

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 01:07:50PM +0700, Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote:
> Btw, sir, this can be simplified more by merging the forward copy
> path, only using two "rep movsb" for both memmove() and memcpy()
> should be enough?
> ```
> __asm__ (
> ".section .text.nolibc_memmove_memcpy\n"
> ".weak memmove\n"
> ".weak memcpy\n"
> "memmove:\n"
>         "movq %rdx, %rcx\n"
>         "movq %rdi, %rdx\n"
>         "movq %rdi, %rax\n"
>         "subq %rsi, %rdx\n"
>         "cmpq %rcx, %rdx\n"
>         "jnb __nolibc_forward_copy\n"
>         "leaq -1(%rdi, %rcx, 1), %rdi\n"
>         "leaq -1(%rsi, %rcx, 1), %rsi\n"
>         "std\n"
>         "rep movsb\n"
>         "cld\n"
>         "retq\n"
> 
> "memcpy:\n"
>         "movq %rdi, %rax\n"
>         "movq %rdx, %rcx\n"
> "__nolibc_forward_copy:\n"
>         "rep movsb\n"
>         "retq\n"
> );
> ```

Looks good. I'll apply that change.

-- 
Ammar Faizi