linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: correct i.MX8ULP and i.MX93

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 17 Sep 2023 09:52:31 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: correct i.MX8ULP and
 i.MX93

On 16/09/2023 04:03, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> 
> i.MX8ULP and i.MX93 actually has two interrupts for each gpio
> controller, one for Trustzone non-secure world, one for secure world.
> 
> And they has one register based, not two as i.MX7ULP or VF610.
> 
> Although the Linux Kernel driver gpio-vf610.c could work with
> fsl,imx7ulp-gpio compatible, it is based on some tricks did in
> device tree with some offset added to base address.
> 
> So actually i.MX8ULP/i.MX93 is not compatible with i.MX7ULP.
> 
> Last, i.MX93 is directly derived from i.MX8ULP, so make i.MX93 GPIO
> compatible with i.MX8ULP
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml       | 41 +++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml
> index 59427d97adf5..8c1f87a1a393 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ description: |
>  properties:
>    compatible:
>      oneOf:
> +      - const: fsl,imx8ulp-gpio
>        - const: fsl,vf610-gpio
>        - items:
>            - const: fsl,imx7ulp-gpio
> @@ -27,16 +28,21 @@ properties:
>        - items:
>            - enum:
>                - fsl,imx93-gpio
> -              - fsl,imx8ulp-gpio
> -          - const: fsl,imx7ulp-gpio
> +          - const: fsl,imx8ulp-gpio
>  
>    reg:
>      description: The first reg tuple represents the PORT module, the second tuple
>        represents the GPIO module.
> -    maxItems: 2
> +    items:
> +      - description: PORT register base address
> +      - description: GPIO register base address
> +    minItems: 1
>  
>    interrupts:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    items:
> +      - description: GPIO Trustzone non-secure interrupt number
> +      - description: GPIO Trustzone secure interrupt number
> +    minItems: 1
>  
>    interrupt-controller: true
>  
> @@ -78,6 +84,33 @@ required:
>    - "#gpio-cells"
>    - gpio-controller
>  
> +allOf:
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - fsl,vf610-gpio
> +              - fsl,imx7ulp-gpio
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        interrupts:
> +          items:
> +            - description: GPIO interrupt number

So this is different than first interrupt mentioned in top-level?


> +        reg:
> +          items:
> +            - description: PORT register base address
> +            - description: GPIO register base address

You have the description in top-level, no need to repeat it. Just
minItems: 2... although it depends whether top-level property will stay.


> +    else:
> +      properties:
> +        interrupts:
> +          items:
> +            - description: GPIO Trustzone non-secure interrupt number
> +            - description: GPIO Trustzone secure interrupt number
> +        reg:
> +          items:
> +            - description: GPIO register base address

So the first entry is different between variants? Then top-level should
be just min/maxItems.

> +
>  additionalProperties: false
>  
>  examples:
> 

Best regards,
Krzysztof