linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bcachefs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2023 11:32:22 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bcachefs tree

Hi Andrew,

On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:31:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:23:30 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:10:11 +0800 Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > > > Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:27:22 +1000
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: convert to dynamically allocated shrinkers
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > > > ---
> > > >   fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.c     | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> > > >   fs/bcachefs/btree_key_cache.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> > > >   fs/bcachefs/btree_types.h     |  4 ++--
> > > >   fs/bcachefs/fs.c              |  2 +-
> > > >   fs/bcachefs/sysfs.c           |  2 +-
> > > >   5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)    
> > > 
> > > This version looks good to me.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>    
> > 
> > I not longer carry a post-linux-next patch queue, so there's nothing I
> > can do with this patch.  I'll assume that either Kent or I will merge
> > it later, depending upon whose stuff goes into mainline first.  
> 
> Actually the correct plan is for you and Kent to inform Linus of the
> need for this patch as part of the merge resolution when he merges the
> latter of your trees (unless you want to stabilise the shrinker changes
> into a separate branch that is never rewritten and is merged into your
> tree and the bcachefs tree).

This is now a conflict between the mm-stable tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped