lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:00:13 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: introduce new field flags in block_device

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 05:38:46PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> 
> There are multiple switches in struct block_device, use seperate bool
> fields for them is not gracefully. Add a new field flags and replace
> swithes to a bit, there are no functional changes, and preapre to add
> a new switch in the next patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> ---
>  block/bdev.c              | 15 ++++++++-------
>  block/blk-core.c          |  7 ++++---
>  block/genhd.c             |  8 +++++---
>  block/ioctl.c             |  2 +-
>  include/linux/blk_types.h | 12 ++++++------
>  include/linux/blkdev.h    |  5 +++--
>  6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c
> index fc8d28d77495..cb849bcf61ae 100644
> --- a/block/bdev.c
> +++ b/block/bdev.c
> @@ -408,10 +408,10 @@ struct block_device *bdev_alloc(struct gendisk *disk, u8 partno)
>  	bdev->bd_partno = partno;
>  	bdev->bd_inode = inode;
>  	bdev->bd_queue = disk->queue;
> -	if (partno)
> -		bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio;
> +	if (partno && test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags))
> +		set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags);
>  	else
> -		bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = false;
> +		clear_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags);
>  	bdev->bd_stats = alloc_percpu(struct disk_stats);
>  	if (!bdev->bd_stats) {
>  		iput(inode);
> @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
>  		bdev->bd_holder = NULL;
>  		bdev->bd_holder_ops = NULL;
>  		mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_holder_lock);
> -		if (bdev->bd_write_holder)
> +		if (test_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags))
>  			unblock = true;
>  	}
>  	if (!whole->bd_holders)
> @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
>  	 */
>  	if (unblock) {
>  		disk_unblock_events(bdev->bd_disk);
> -		bdev->bd_write_holder = false;
> +		clear_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -878,9 +878,10 @@ struct bdev_handle *bdev_open_by_dev(dev_t dev, blk_mode_t mode, void *holder,
>  		 * writeable reference is too fragile given the way @mode is
>  		 * used in blkdev_get/put().
>  		 */
> -		if ((mode & BLK_OPEN_WRITE) && !bdev->bd_write_holder &&
> +		if ((mode & BLK_OPEN_WRITE) &&
> +		    !test_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags) &&
>  		    (disk->event_flags & DISK_EVENT_FLAG_BLOCK_ON_EXCL_WRITE)) {
> -			bdev->bd_write_holder = true;
> +			set_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags);
>  			unblock_events = false;
>  		}
>  	}
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index fdf25b8d6e78..577a693165d8 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -482,7 +482,8 @@ __setup("fail_make_request=", setup_fail_make_request);
>  
>  bool should_fail_request(struct block_device *part, unsigned int bytes)
>  {
> -	return part->bd_make_it_fail && should_fail(&fail_make_request, bytes);
> +	return test_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &part->flags) &&
> +		should_fail(&fail_make_request, bytes);
>  }
>  
>  static int __init fail_make_request_debugfs(void)
> @@ -595,7 +596,7 @@ static void __submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>  	if (unlikely(!blk_crypto_bio_prep(&bio)))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (!bio->bi_bdev->bd_has_submit_bio) {
> +	if (!test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bio->bi_bdev->flags)) {
>  		blk_mq_submit_bio(bio);
>  	} else if (likely(bio_queue_enter(bio) == 0)) {
>  		struct gendisk *disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk;
> @@ -703,7 +704,7 @@ void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio)
>  	 */
>  	if (current->bio_list)
>  		bio_list_add(&current->bio_list[0], bio);
> -	else if (!bio->bi_bdev->bd_has_submit_bio)
> +	else if (!test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bio->bi_bdev->flags))
>  		__submit_bio_noacct_mq(bio);
>  	else
>  		__submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index c9d06f72c587..026f4c6d5b7e 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -413,7 +413,8 @@ int __must_check device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk,
>  	elevator_init_mq(disk->queue);
>  
>  	/* Mark bdev as having a submit_bio, if needed */
> -	disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->fops->submit_bio != NULL;
> +	if (disk->fops->submit_bio)
> +		set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the driver provides an explicit major number it also must provide
> @@ -1062,7 +1063,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(diskseq, 0444, diskseq_show, NULL);
>  ssize_t part_fail_show(struct device *dev,
>  		       struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
> -	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_make_it_fail);
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n",
> +		       test_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &dev_to_bdev(dev)->flags));
>  }
>  
>  ssize_t part_fail_store(struct device *dev,
> @@ -1072,7 +1074,7 @@ ssize_t part_fail_store(struct device *dev,
>  	int i;
>  
>  	if (count > 0 && sscanf(buf, "%d", &i) > 0)
> -		dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_make_it_fail = i;
> +		set_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &dev_to_bdev(dev)->flags);
>  
>  	return count;
>  }
> diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
> index 4160f4e6bd5b..a548c718a5fb 100644
> --- a/block/ioctl.c
> +++ b/block/ioctl.c
> @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static int blkdev_roset(struct block_device *bdev, unsigned cmd,
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> -	bdev->bd_read_only = n;
> +	set_bit(BD_FLAG_READ_ONLY, &bdev->flags);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> index 52e264d5a830..95bd26c62655 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> @@ -37,17 +37,20 @@ struct bio_crypt_ctx;
>  #define PAGE_SECTORS		(1 << PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT)
>  #define SECTOR_MASK		(PAGE_SECTORS - 1)
>  
> +#define BD_FLAG_READ_ONLY	0 /* read-only-policy */
> +#define BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER	1
> +#define BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO	2
> +#define BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL	3
> +
>  struct block_device {
>  	sector_t		bd_start_sect;
>  	sector_t		bd_nr_sectors;
>  	struct gendisk *	bd_disk;
>  	struct request_queue *	bd_queue;
>  	struct disk_stats __percpu *bd_stats;
> +	unsigned long		flags;
>  	unsigned long		bd_stamp;
> -	bool			bd_read_only;	/* read-only policy */
>  	u8			bd_partno;
> -	bool			bd_write_holder;
> -	bool			bd_has_submit_bio;

The idea looks good, but not necessary to add new 8 bytes, and you may
put all these flags and `bd_partno` into single 'unsigned long', and add
helpers to retrieve part no, since there are not many ->bd_partno
references.

Thanks,
Ming

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ