linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 01/14] page_pool: make sure frag API fields don't span between cachelines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:55:00 +0800
From:   Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To:     Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
CC:     Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>,
        Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
        David Christensen <drc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 01/14] page_pool: make sure frag API fields
 don't span between cachelines

On 2023/11/27 22:08, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:29:22 +0800
> 
>> On 2023/11/24 23:47, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>> After commit 5027ec19f104 ("net: page_pool: split the page_pool_params
>>> into fast and slow") that made &page_pool contain only "hot" params at
>>> the start, cacheline boundary chops frag API fields group in the middle
>>> again.
>>> To not bother with this each time fast params get expanded or shrunk,
>>> let's just align them to `4 * sizeof(long)`, the closest upper pow-2 to
>>> their actual size (2 longs + 2 ints). This ensures 16-byte alignment for
>>> the 32-bit architectures and 32-byte alignment for the 64-bit ones,
>>> excluding unnecessary false-sharing.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>>  include/net/page_pool/types.h | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/types.h b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
>>> index e1bb92c192de..989d07b831fc 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/page_pool/types.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
>>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct page_pool {
>>>  
>>>  	bool has_init_callback;
>>
>> It seems odd to have only a slow field between tow fast
>> field group, isn't it better to move it to the end of
>> page_pool or where is more appropriate?
> 
> 1. There will be more in the subsequent patches.
> 2. ::has_init_callback happens each new page allocation, it's not slow.
>    Jakub did put it here for purpose.
> 
>>
>>>  
>>> -	long frag_users;
>>> +	long frag_users __aligned(4 * sizeof(long));
>>
>> If we need that, why not just use '____cacheline_aligned_in_smp'?
> 
> It can be an overkill. We don't need a full cacheline, but only these
> fields to stay within one, no matter whether they are in the beginning
> of it or at the end.

I am still a little lost here, A comment explaining why using '4' in the
above would be really helpful here.