linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] riscv: xchg: Prefetch the destination word for sc.w

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:24:40 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, 
	panqinglin2020@...as.ac.cn, bjorn@...osinc.com, conor.dooley@...rochip.com, 
	peterz@...radead.org, keescook@...omium.org, wuwei2016@...as.ac.cn, 
	xiaoguang.xing@...hgo.com, chao.wei@...hgo.com, unicorn_wang@...look.com, 
	uwu@...nowy.me, jszhang@...nel.org, wefu@...hat.com, atishp@...shpatra.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] riscv: xchg: Prefetch the destination word for sc.w

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 3:45 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 02:15:45PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 7:19 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 03:29:53AM -0500, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > >
> > > > The cost of changing a cacheline from shared to exclusive state can be
> > > > significant, especially when this is triggered by an exclusive store,
> > > > since it may result in having to retry the transaction.
> > > >
> > > > This patch makes use of prefetch.w to prefetch cachelines for write
> > > > prior to lr/sc loops when using the xchg_small atomic routine.
> > > >
> > > > This patch is inspired by commit: 0ea366f5e1b6 ("arm64: atomics:
> > > > prefetch the destination word for write prior to stxr").
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 4 +++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> > > > index 26cea2395aae..d7b9d7951f08 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> > > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > > >
> > > >  #include <asm/barrier.h>
> > > >  #include <asm/fence.h>
> > > > +#include <asm/processor.h>
> > > >
> > > >  #define __arch_xchg_masked(prepend, append, r, p, n)                 \
> > >
> > > Are you sure this is based on v6.7-rc7? Because I don't see this macro.
> > Oh, it is based on Leobras' patches. I would remove it in the next of version.
>
> I would say this next :)
Thx for the grammar correction.

>
> >
> > >
> > > >  ({                                                                   \
> > > > @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@
> > > >                                                                       \
> > > >       __asm__ __volatile__ (                                          \
> > > >              prepend                                                  \
> > > > +            PREFETCHW_ASM(%5)                                        \
> > > >              "0:      lr.w %0, %2\n"                                  \
> > > >              "        and  %1, %0, %z4\n"                             \
> > > >              "        or   %1, %1, %z3\n"                             \
> > > > @@ -30,7 +32,7 @@
> > > >              "        bnez %1, 0b\n"                                  \
> > > >              append                                                   \
> > > >              : "=&r" (__retx), "=&r" (__rc), "+A" (*(__ptr32b))       \
> > > > -            : "rJ" (__newx), "rJ" (~__mask)                          \
> > > > +            : "rJ" (__newx), "rJ" (~__mask), "rJ" (__ptr32b)         \
> > >
> > > I'm pretty sure we don't want to allow the J constraint for __ptr32b.
> > >
> > > >              : "memory");                                             \
> > > >                                                                       \
> > > >       r = (__typeof__(*(p)))((__retx & __mask) >> __s);               \
> > > > --
> > > > 2.40.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > drew
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> >  Guo Ren
> >
>
> Nice patch :)
> Any reason it's not needed in __arch_cmpxchg_masked(), and __arch_cmpxchg() ?
CAS is a conditional AMO, unlike xchg (Stand AMO). Arm64 is wrong, or
they have a problem with the hardware.

>
> Thanks!
> Leo
>


-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren