lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 08:53:31 -0500
From: Zack Rusin <zack.rusin@...adcom.com>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, 
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/ttm: Make sure the mapped tt pages are decrypted
 when needed

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:51 AM Zack Rusin <zack.rusin@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
> Some drivers require the mapped tt pages to be decrypted. In an ideal
> world this would have been handled by the dma layer, but the TTM page
> fault handling would have to be rewritten to able to do that.
>
> A side-effect of the TTM page fault handling is using a dma allocation
> per order (via ttm_pool_alloc_page) which makes it impossible to just
> trivially use dma_mmap_attrs. As a result ttm has to be very careful
> about trying to make its pgprot for the mapped tt pages match what
> the dma layer thinks it is. At the ttm layer it's possible to
> deduce the requirement to have tt pages decrypted by checking
> whether coherent dma allocations have been requested and the system
> is running with confidential computing technologies.
>
> This approach isn't ideal but keeping TTM matching DMAs expectations
> for the page properties is in general fragile, unfortunately proper
> fix would require a rewrite of TTM's page fault handling.
>
> Fixes vmwgfx with SEV enabled.
>
> v2: Explicitly include cc_platform.h
> v3: Use CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT instead of CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT to
> limit the scope to guests and log when memory decryption is enabled.

Sorry, this also got a bit lost during the s/VMware/Broadcom/
transition. It seems to be pretty safe in general now. I wasn't able
to find a really clean way of adding a warn_once when pte's don't
match as suggested by Thomas, but I did add a quick log to at least
point out in the logs that we've enabled memory decryption in tt.

z

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ