linux-kernel - Re: Adding warning icon to warning admonitions?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 07:59:09 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Documentation
 <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Adding warning icon to warning admonitions?

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> writes:

> For the icon itself, the approach is to use Font Awesome [2] (many other doc
> sites that uses Sphinx also do that due to site theme they use but Alabaster
> theme don't use the icon, hence this question). I personally prefer regular
> icon variant (like in TT), but alas it is in non-free PRO plan (and only
> solid variant is free and that is what Sphinx themes using).
>
> Does adding warning icon like above idea make sense for the kernel docs? And
> does it require non-trivial (complex) changes to Alabaster theme?

It can probably be done with a bit of CSS tweaking.  I don't really like
the idea of requiring the installation of another font to build the
docs, though, and Font Awesome looks like it could bring in licensing
issues of its own - that's not clear from the site at all.

jon