linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/47] 5.4.266-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 11:01:44 -0600
From: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
 rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, jpanis@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/47] 5.4.266-rc1 review

Hello!

On 05/01/24 10:04 a. m., Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 05/01/24 8:38 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.266 release.
>> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Sun, 07 Jan 2024 14:38:02 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.266-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> Quick note that there are Arm32 failures:
> 
> -----8<-----
>    /builds/linux/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c: In function 'sysc_reset':
>    /builds/linux/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c:1847:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'fsleep'; did you mean 'ssleep'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     1847 |    fsleep(ddata->cfg.srst_udelay);
>          |    ^~~~~~
>          |    ssleep
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>    make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:262: drivers/bus/ti-sysc.o] Error 1
> ----->8-----

Bisection points to:

   commit bed75624164c501b39531927d07a4fadc5738847
   Author: Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>
   Date:   Mon Aug 21 16:24:18 2023 +0200

       bus: ti-sysc: Use fsleep() instead of usleep_range() in sysc_reset()
       
       [ Upstream commit d929b2b7464f95ec01e47f560b1e687482ba8929 ]

Reverting (swapping back the content of that commit, as it wasn't a clean revert) did make the build pass.

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org