linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable built-in thermal monitoring on rk3588

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 01:04:38 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
 Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
 Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@...labora.com>,
 Tamás Szűcs <szucst@....uni-miskolc.hu>,
 Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>,
 Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>, Jagan Teki <jagan@...eble.ai>,
 Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable built-in thermal
 monitoring on rk3588


Hi Alexey,


On 21/01/2024 20:57, Alexey Charkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 8:21 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
> 
> Thanks a lot for your review and comments! Please see some reflections below.
> 
>> On 09/01/2024 20:19, Alexey Charkov wrote:
>>> Include thermal zones information in device tree for rk3588 variants
>>> and enable the built-in thermal sensing ADC on RADXA Rock 5B
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>>    - Dropped redundant comments
>>>    - Included all CPU cores in cooling maps
>>>    - Split cooling maps into more granular ones utilizing TSADC
>>>      channels 1-3 which measure temperature by separate CPU clusters
>>>      instead of channel 0 which measures the center of the SoC die
>>> ---
>>>    .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts      |   4 +
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi     | 151 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>    2 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts
>>> index a5a104131403..f9d540000de3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts
>>> @@ -772,3 +772,7 @@ &usb_host1_ehci {
>>>    &usb_host1_ohci {
>>>        status = "okay";
>>>    };
>>> +
>>> +&tsadc {
>>> +     status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
>>> index 8aa0499f9b03..8d54998d0ecc 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>>    #include <dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
>>>    #include <dt-bindings/phy/phy.h>
>>>    #include <dt-bindings/ata/ahci.h>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
>>>
>>>    / {
>>>        compatible = "rockchip,rk3588";
>>> @@ -2112,6 +2113,156 @@ tsadc: tsadc@...00000 {
>>>                status = "disabled";
>>>        };
>>>
>>> +     thermal_zones: thermal-zones {
>>> +             /* sensor near the center of the whole chip */
>>> +             soc_thermal: soc-thermal {
>>> +                     polling-delay-passive = <20>;
>>
>> There is no mitigation set for this thermal zone. It is pointless to
>> specify a passive polling.
> 
> Indeed, it makes sense to me. There seems to be a catch though in that
> the driver calls the generic thermal_of_zone_register during the
> initial probe, which expects both of those polling delays to be
> present in the device tree, otherwise it simply refuses to add the
> respective thermal zone, see drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c:502

Usually:

polling-delay-passive = <0>;
polling-delay = <0>;

cf:

git grep "polling-delay = <0>" arch/arm64/boot/dts

>>> +                     polling-delay = <1000>;
>>
>> The driver is interrupt driven. No need to poll.
> 
> Same here as above
> 
>>> +                     sustainable-power = <2100>;
>>
>> There is no mitigation with this thermal zone. Specifying a sustainable
>> power does not make sense.
> 
> Thanks, will drop this in v3!
> 
>>> +                     thermal-sensors = <&tsadc 0>;
>>> +
>>> +                     trips {
>>> +                             soc_crit: soc-crit {
>>> +                                     temperature = <115000>;
>>> +                                     hysteresis = <2000>;
>>
>> This trip point leads to a system shutdown / reboot. It is not necessary
>> to specify a hysteresis.
> 
> Similar to the above, the generic thermal_of code refuses to add the
> trip point if it has no hysteresis property defined (regardless of the
> trip type), see drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c:109

hysteresis = <0>;


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog