netdev - Re: [G[PATCH 1/2][ENETLINK] max cmd boundary chec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:30:27 -0500
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [G[PATCH 1/2][ENETLINK] max cmd boundary chec

Shall i assume that the patch showed up fine i.e no crap like mime?
I still didnt get an echo back, did it make the list?

On Fri, 2006-01-12 at 13:49 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:

> I can't see why this should be required. genl_register_ops()
> enforces a unique command id 
> and genl_ops->cmd is u8 so there is no way to register more than 
> 256 commands anyway.

By mistake during the tutorial, i had the id at something like 321.
It registered fine but then listing the command showed it with a
different id than what i thought it should be. I think it chops off
all the bystes other than the LS one - which is not a good error
check.
The compiler will whine actually. If you ignore it (perhaps not seeing
the warning in a mass compile) it registers just fine.

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html