netdev - Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:00:09 +0100
From:	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:53:14 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The situation is more complicated for wireless. Userspace expects to be 
> able to get scan results from the card even if the interface is down.

User space should get an error when trying to get scan results from the
interface that is down. Some drivers are broken and don't do this but
when they're fixed there is no problem here.

> In that case, I'm pretty sure we need a third state rather than just
> "up" or "down".

We have that third state, it's IFF_DORMANT. Not supported yet by any
wireless driver/stack, unfortunately.

Thanks,

 Jiri

-- 
Jiri Benc
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html