netdev - Re: Are you responsible for Fedora's ifenslave utility?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:37:28 -0500
From:	"Eric S. Raymond" <esr@...rsus.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Are you responsible for Fedora's ifenslave utility?

Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:35:05AM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > Are you responsible for the ifenslave utility that ships with Fedora Core?
> 
> Eric, asking on an upstream list about distribution maintainers is totally
> inappropriate, so please stop it.  Fedora has enough mailing lists of their
> own.

Don't make so many presumptions.  I had to try to locate the upstream 
maintainers precisely because it wasn't clear whether I'm looking at a
Fedora packaging problem or something further upstream.

Jay Vosburgh and  I are trying to detemine that now.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html