lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:24:07 +0300 From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> To: Johann Borck <johann.borck@...sedata.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: considering kevent - the kernel development process On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:03:44PM +0100, Johann Borck (johann.borck@...sedata.com) wrote: > So my questions are: > > What in general is wrong with kevent? > > What, in detail is wrong with kevent / its proposed interface? > > What features are missing? > > What are the (real) reasons for the way it is discussed? Fsck it, Johann :) It is a trend (a politics) to hide head into the sand and feel like nothing happend - open source does not have mechanisms to force people to do something (like comment on foreign ideas/implementations), so people make a look like problem does not exist and solve it using own way. There will be tons of other interesting stuff, stay tuned :) -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists