netdev - Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:17:59 -0400
From:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	saw@....sw.com.sg
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the scheduled removal of the eepro100 driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
> 
> 
This keeps coming around, but I haven't seen an answer to the questions 
raised by Eric Piel or Kiszka. I do know that e100 didn't work on some 
IBM rackmount servers and eepro100 did, but since I'm no longer 
responsible for those machines I can't retest. Perhaps someone will be 
able to provide data points.

IBM current offerings as of about three years ago, I had a few dozen of 
them at one time.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html