netdev - Re: [PATCH] NET : secure sequence number functions can use nsec resolution instead of usec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:31:56 -0400 (EDT)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET : secure sequence number functions can use nsec
 resolution instead of usec

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Hello David
> 
> We could use the nanosec resolution for various functions defined in drivers/char/random.c
> (secure_tcpv6_sequence_number(), secure_tcp_sequence_number(), secure_dccp_sequence_number())
> 
> I am not sure if it's a netdev related patch or core kernel, so I have CC Andrew.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> [PATCH] NET : random functions can use nsec resolution instead of usec
> 
> In order to get more randomness for secure_tcpv6_sequence_number(), secure_tcp_sequence_number(), secure_dccp_sequence_number() functions, we can use the high resolution time services, providing nanosec resolution.
> 
> I've also done two kmalloc()/kzalloc() conversions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html