netdev - Re: [NETLINK 01/04]: Switch cb_lock spinlock to mutex and allow to override it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	kaber@...sh.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NETLINK 01/04]: Switch cb_lock spinlock to mutex and allow to
 override it

From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:51:53 +0200 (MEST)

> [NETLINK]: Switch cb_lock spinlock to mutex and allow to override it
> 
> Switch cb_lock to mutex and allow netlink kernel users to override it
> with a subsystem specific mutex for consistent locking in dump callbacks.
> All netlink_dump_start users have been audited not to rely on any
> side-effects of the previously used spinlock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>

Applied.

The call signature of netlink_kernel_create() is getting huge.
It's getting near the time we should pass in a descriotor
block in the form of a structure to specify all of these
parameters.

It would have even made this patch significantly smaller since the
default of NULL would have worked out perfectly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html