netdev - Re: Slow tcp handshakes rate of 2.6.20 and 2.6.19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:27:49 +0800
From:	"Quan Sun" <cfk.quan@...il.com>
To:	"Robert Iakobashvili" <coroberti@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slow tcp handshakes rate of 2.6.20 and 2.6.19

Hi,
On 4/28/07, Robert Iakobashvili <coroberti@...il.com> wrote:
> What are the
> #cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_mem values for your kernels?
>
> Do you see tcp memory pressure by
> #netstat -s ?
>

In my original kernel (2.6.20.6),  tcp_mem is
 24576, 32768, 49152
There is several memory_pressure in the `netstat -s`.

After patching
author  John Heffner <jheffner@....edu>
        Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:04:03 +0000 (15:04 -0700)
commit  53cdcc04c1e85d4e423b2822b66149b6f2e52c2c
[TCP]: Fix tcp_mem[] initialization.

In 2.6.20.6-patched, tcp_mem is
97440, 129920, 194880
And during my benchmark, 'memory_pressure' is always 0.

After these two days test, this patch works fine for me and benchmark
gets a good result(as good as 2.6.18).

Thank you very much for your help.
-- 
Quan Sun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html