lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:17:41 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> To: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org> CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, paulus@...ba.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2007, at 10:47 PM, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> >> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:44:46 +1000 >> >>> So can I take this as a future OK for architecture specific network >>> drivers changes to go through the architecture trees (cc'd to you)? >> >> It's been my experience that if I'm just working through some >> platform or bus specific API changes, people like Jeff tend to >> not mind if it goes via ARCH trees and the like. > > Is this acceptable? Just want to make sure before I ask Paul to pull > some changes that touches the following drivers: > > drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-scc.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ucc_geth.c | 30 ++++---- > drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm1.c | 4 +- > drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c | 4 +- I don't see a patch, just a diffstat. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists