netdev - Re: [stable] [PATCH 2.6.21-stable] [IPV6]: Restore semantics of Routing Header processing.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 May 2007 01:28:20 +0900 (JST)
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To:	chrisw@...s-sol.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2.6.21-stable] [IPV6]: Restore semantics of
 Routing Header processing.

In article <20070511162243.GC3516@...uoia.sous-sol.org> (at Fri, 11 May 2007 09:22:43 -0700), Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> says:

> * YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 (yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org) wrote:
> > The "fix" for emerging security threats was overkill and it broke
> > basic semantic of IPv6 routing header processing.  We should assume
> > RT0 (or even RT2, depends on configuration) as "unknown" RH type so
> > that we
> > - silently ignore the routing header if segleft == 0
> > - or, send ICMPv6 Parameter Problem message back to the sender,
> >   otherwise.
> 
> Does that mean this one has received testing and is good for -stable
> now, or does it need some bake time?

Chris, I think it is okay, but
please wait for Dave's approval.
Thanks.

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html