lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:48:18 -0400 From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com> To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please pull 'libertas' branch of wireless-2.6 On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 17:16 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 05:13:17PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 11:28 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:07 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > John W. Linville wrote: > > > > > Lots of stuff here...probably best for 2.6.23... > > > > > > > > Is this best for Linux users... or just easy for developers? > > > > > > > > Won't putting off all these fixes until 2.6.23 leave the driver released > > > > in 2.6.22 in shoddy shape? > > > > If you think all the bits from this should just go to 2.6.22, that's > > > fine with me. But I don't feel comfortable making that call given what > > > I thought were the constraints on pushing changes through during an rc > > > cycle. When the merge window was open, we backported critical bug fixes > > > and necessary merge-requirement cleanups to the code in linville's tree, > > > but avoided changes that didn't impact function. > > > > Any response on these points yet? I've got yet more cleanups and a few > > other things queued in libertas-2.6 but I'd like to see where this > > discussion goes before sending a pull request for the new bits. > > As for me, I have no great problem w/ the whole batch going to 2.6.22. > The driver is still new and most acknowledge it still has significant > defficiencies. Most (but probably not all) of the patches would seem > to fit some definition of bug fix anyway. I was just trying to err > on the side of caution and follow the normal "bugfixes in -rc" process. > > Jeff, the branch in question is based off a vanilla 2.6.22-rc3. > So it is safe to pull (from a "won't mess-up my tree" perspective) > if you are so inclined. Ok; if Jeff is so inclined, we'll push further libertas cleanups/bugfixes/etc to you, and then you upstream to Jeff, targetted for inclusion in 2.6.22. Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists