[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rick.jones2@...com
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, kaber@...sh.net, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org, auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support.
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:48:59 -0700
> > RX queues - yes, I can see; TX queues, it doesnt make sense to put
> > different rings on different CPUs.
>
> To what extent might that preclude some cachelines bouncing hither and
> yon between the CPUs?
I think per-TX-queue locking takes locality as another advantage.
You only touch the TX descriptors for queue N, rather than a single
globally shared one.
Same goes for RX.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists