netdev - Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel (v.2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2007 08:51:18 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel (v.2)

Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>   
>> Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>>     
>>> Veth stands for Virtual ETHernet. It is a simple tunnel driver
>>> that works at the link layer and looks like a pair of ethernet
>>> devices interconnected with each other.
>>>   
>>>       
>> As Dave mentioned, there is already a driver known as 'veth'.  Maybe borrow
>> the etun name as well?
>>     
>
> We have already seen that this driver uses ethXXX names for
> its devices and Dave agreed with veth one. Moreover Alexey
> Kuznetsov said that he would prefer the name veth for etun.
>   
Ok, fine by me.  I started reading mail from the wrong direction this 
morning :)
>   
>> I would also like some way to identify veth from other device types,
>> preferably
>> something like a value in sysfs.   However, that should not hold up
>>     
>
> We can do this with ethtool. It can get and print the driver 
> name of the device.
>   
I think I'd like something in sysfs that we could query for any 
interface.  Possible return
strings could be:
VLAN
VETH
ETH
PPP
BRIDGE
AP /* wifi access point interface */
STA /* wifi station */
....

I will cook up a patch for consideration after veth goes in.

>> I think you need at least the option to zero out the time-stamp,
>> otherwise it will
>> not be re-calculated when received on the peer, and it potentially spent
>> significant
>> time since it was last calculated (think netem delay or similar).
>>
>> +        /* Zero out the time-stamp so that receiving code is forced
>> +         * to recalculate it.
>> +         */
>> +        skb->tstamp.off_sec = 0;
>> +        skb->tstamp.off_usec = 0;
>>
>>     
>>> +
>>> +    rcv_priv = netdev_priv(rcv);
>>> +    skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
>>> +    skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, rcv);
>>> +    if (dev->features & NETIF_F_NO_CSUM)
>>> +        skb->ip_summed = rcv_priv->ip_summed;
>>> +
>>> +    dst_release(skb->dst);
>>> +    skb->dst = NULL;
>>> +    secpath_reset(skb);
>>> +    nf_reset(skb);
>>> +    skb->mark = 0;
>>> +
>>> +    length = skb->len;
>>>   
>>>       
>> This should be done before you do the eth_type_trans, as that pulls the
>> header and your
>> byte counters will be off.
>>     
>
> This will be ETH_HLEN larger, do you mean this? I think this is
> normal as this device tries to look like an "iron" ethernet card :)
>   
For device counters, it should count the number of bytes received, 
including all headers,
but excluding the ethernet FCS.   If an 'iron' card did differently, I'd 
consider it a bug.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> 
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html