netdev - FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:54:17 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
	krkumar2@...ibm.com, gaagaan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rick.jones2@...com, sri@...ibm.com
Subject: FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching

On Tue, 2007-19-06 at 15:28 -0700, David Miller wrote:

> Converting pktgen over to ktime_t might be a nice cleanup.

Would that really solve it? i.e doesnt it still tie to what the clock
source is?

I had a friend of mine (Robert, you know Jeremy) and results are
slightly different from what Evginy found.

The summary is: Batching always is better, jiffies is always the better
clock source (and who would have thunk,eh? Opteron kicks a Xeons ass).
Attached results.

Evgeniy, did you sync on the batching case with the git tree?
Can you describe your hardware in /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/interupts?

cheers,
jamal

View attachment "batch-clock-res" of type "text/plain" (2631 bytes)