netdev - Re: FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:08:19 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
	krkumar2@...ibm.com, gaagaan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rick.jones2@...com, sri@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit
	batching

On Thu, 2007-21-06 at 11:54 -0400, jamal wrote:

> The summary is: Batching always is better, jiffies is always the better
> clock source (and who would have thunk,eh? Opteron kicks a Xeons ass).

The results in the table for opteron and xeon are swapped when
cutnpasting from a larger test result. So Opteron is the one with better
results.
In any case - off for the day over here.

cheers,
jamal


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html