netdev - Re: FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:55:46 -0400
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se,
	johnpol@....mipt.ru, krkumar2@...ibm.com, gaagaan@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rick.jones2@...com, sri@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:08:19PM -0400, jamal wrote:
> The results in the table for opteron and xeon are swapped when
> cutnpasting from a larger test result. So Opteron is the one with better
> results.
> In any case - off for the day over here.

You should qualify that as 'Old P4 Xeon', as the Core 2 Xeons are leagues 
better.

		-ben
-- 
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <zyntrop@...ck.org>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html