netdev - Re: FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:59:54 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se,
	johnpol@....mipt.ru, krkumar2@...ibm.com, gaagaan@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rick.jones2@...com, sri@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit
	batching

On Thu, 2007-21-06 at 12:55 -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:

> You should qualify that as 'Old P4 Xeon', as the Core 2 Xeons are leagues 
> better.

The Xeon hardware is not that old - about a year or so (and so is the
opteron). 
BTW, how could you tell this was old Xeon?

cheers,
jamal 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html