netdev - Re: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:32:45 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	yi.zhu@...el.com, kaber@...sh.net, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org, auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support.

On Tue, 2007-26-06 at 13:57 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:27:28 -0400
> 
> > Back to the question: Do you recall how this number was arrived at? 
> > 128 packets will be sent out at GiGe in about 80 microsecs, so from a
> > feel-the-wind-direction perspective it seems reasonable.
> 
> I picked it out of a hat.

It is not a bad value for Gige; doubt it will be a good one for 10/100
or even 10GE.
But you could say that about the ring sizes too.

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html