netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/9] pasemi_mac: Clean TX ring in poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Jul 2007 08:34:22 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] pasemi_mac: Clean TX ring in poll

Olof Johansson wrote:
> Clean the TX ring in the poll call, to avoid sitting on mapped buffers
> for a long time. NFS doesn't seem to like it much, for example.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> 
> Index: netdev-2.6/drivers/net/pasemi_mac.c
> ===================================================================
> --- netdev-2.6.orig/drivers/net/pasemi_mac.c
> +++ netdev-2.6/drivers/net/pasemi_mac.c
> @@ -1052,6 +1052,7 @@ static int pasemi_mac_poll(struct net_de
>  	int pkts, limit = min(*budget, dev->quota);
>  	struct pasemi_mac *mac = netdev_priv(dev);
>  
> +	pasemi_mac_clean_tx(mac);
>  	pkts = pasemi_mac_clean_rx(mac, limit);

Why is this needed?  Is your TX interrupt mitigated or delayed somehow?

In general, drivers should only clean TX in one place.  Doing so in 
multiple places tends to indicate a bug somewhere.

You are correct that you should not sit on buffers for too long -- that 
increases latency of all who are waiting on those buffers to be sent.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html