netdev - Re: Who's allowed to set a skb destructor?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:44:03 +0200
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...-lyon.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: Who's allowed to set a skb destructor?

On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 11:08:35AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> BSDs were sometimes recommended for specific jobs like mail etc.
> but usually linux better fitted the needs. Especially well linux
> appeared for an internet gateway/router/firewall/antispam thing,
> and the main reasons were: netfilter with additional, unofficial
> patches e.g. l-7 filtering and imq. BSD was no option here.

I've forgotten to mention two other "performance boosters" which
very often completed these solutions: htb or hfsc.

Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html