netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Virtual ethernet device driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:24:02 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Virtual ethernet device driver

Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>>+
>>>+	if (tb[IFLA_IFNAME])
>>>+		nla_strlcpy(ifname, tb[IFLA_IFNAME], IFNAMSIZ);
>>>+	else
>>>+		snprintf(ifname, IFNAMSIZ, DRV_NAME "%%d");
>>
>>
>>Does this work? The other device is not registered at this time, so I
>>think the allocated names could clash ..
> 
> 
> Oh! And one more thing, I've just thought about - even two devices with
> similar name would be ok when we have a namespaces and one of the ends of
> this tunnel is to be in some other namespace rather that the init one.


Yes, but we don't have network namespaces yet. Which brings up another
question: is this driver of any use without namespaces?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html