netdev - Re: [PATCH]: Resurrect napi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
	jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Resurrect napi_poll patch.

From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:10:23 +1000

> In five years' time, the "napi_struct for simple drivers" in net_device
> will look confusing.  Since your change touches all NAPI drivers anyway,
> it'd be nice to go straight to "everyone allocates their own NAPI
> struct" in one jump.

Good point.

But note that you'd be adding a pointer deref, the current sequence:

napi_struct --> netdev --> driver_private

involves all pointer arithmetic and no derefs, whereas:

napi_struct --> driver_private --> netdev

will involve at least on deref to get to the netdev from the
driver_private.

(Ignore the fact that netdev_priv() is not currently optimized
 as it used to be, that's an abberation of the current multi-queue
 implementation and will be fixed).

So this suggestion does have real downsides.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html