lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:59:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org> cc: wjiang@...ilience.com, wensong@...ux-vs.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de, cfriesen@...tel.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, horms@...ge.net.au, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net, zlynx@....org, Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] make atomic_t volatile on all architectures On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > It works _most of the time_. It used to have problems. Gcc has had problems in various areas. > Ask Martin. Oh you don't even have to, > he told you two mails ago. My last mail simply pointed out that this > isn't a GCC bug, but merely documented behaviour. It was *not* documented behaviour, and there were gcc people who actively *encouraged* use of "+m", and actually fixed gcc. The documentation is buggy. Live with it. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists