lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:45:17 -0700 From: Shirley Ma <xma@...ibm.com> To: linas@...tin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Cc: akepner@....com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>, Marcus@...abs.org, Eder <meder@...ibm.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org, Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...ibm.com>, Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>, Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...ibm.com>, Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>, Thomas Klein <tklein@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface > Just to be clear, in the previous email I posted on this thread, I > described a worst-case network ping-pong test case (send a packet, wait > for reply), and found out that a deffered interrupt scheme just damaged > the performance of the test case. When splitting rx and tx handler, I found some performance gain by deffering interrupt scheme in tx not rx in IPoIB driver. Shirley - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists