netdev - Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:47:23 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jason Dixon <jason@...ongroup.net>, mureninc@...il.com,
	jeff@...zik.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jirislaby@...il.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:55:37 +0200, Adrian Bunk said:

> Jiri's patch would have wrongly not only removed the BSD statement from 
> dual licenced files but also from not dual licenced files.
> 
> This was a mistake in this patch (that was never merged into the tree) 
> neither Jiri nor Alan noticed.

You know, we *could* have solved this a *hell* of a lot easier if people quit
flaming about it, and we did something *productive* instead.

Like submit a corrected patch. :)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped