netdev - Re: RFC: possible NAPI improvements to reduce interrupt rates for low traffic rates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:30:30 +0100
From:	James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, hadi@...erus.ca, davem@...emloft.net,
	jeff@...zik.org, mandeep.baines@...il.com, ossthema@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: RFC: possible NAPI improvements to reduce interrupt rates for
 low traffic rates

Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> What about the latency that NAPI imposes? Right now there are certain applications that
> don't like NAPI because it add several more microseconds, and this may make it worse.

Latency is something that I think this approach will actually improve, 
at the expense of additional polling. Or is it the ksoftirqd scheduling 
latency that you are referring to?

> Maybe a per-device flag or tuning parameters (like weight sysfs value)? or some other
> way to set low-latency values.

Yes. I'd like to think good defaults could be derived though, perhaps 
based on settings like CONFIG_PREEMPT, CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMER, CONFIG_HZ 
and maybe even bogomips / nr_cpus.

-- 
James Chapman
Katalix Systems Ltd
http://www.katalix.com
Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html