netdev - Re: [NFS] problems with lockd in 2.6.22.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:19:45 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...dentenwerk.mhn.de>
Cc:	neilb@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NFS] problems with lockd in 2.6.22.6

On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 05:49:55PM +0200, Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> we upgraded the kernel of a nfs-server from 2.6.17.11 to 2.6.22.6. Since then we get the message
> 
> lockd: too many open TCP sockets, consider increasing the number of nfsd threads
> lockd: last TCP connect from ^\\236^\É^D
> 
> 1) These random characters in the second line are caused by a bug in svc_tcp_accept.
> I already posted this patch on netdev@...r.kernel.org:

Thanks, I've applied that.  (The bug is a little subtle: there's
actually two previous __svc_print_addr() calls which might have
initialized "buf" correctly, and it's not obvious that the second isn't
always called (since it's in a dprintk, which is a macro that expands
into a printk inside a conditional)).

> with this patch applied one gets something like
> 
> lockd: too many open TCP sockets, consider increasing the number of
> nfsd threads lockd: last TCP connect from 10.11.0.12, port=784
> 
> 
> 2) The number of nfsd threads we are running on the machine is 1024.
> So this is not the problem. It seems, though, that in the case of
> lockd svc_tcp_accept does not check the number of nfsd threads but the
> number of lockd threads which is one.  As soon as the number of open
> lockd sockets surpasses 80 this message gets logged.  This usually
> happens every evening when a lot of people shutdown their workstation.

So to be clear: there's not an actual problem here other than that the
logs are getting spammed?  (Not that that isn't a problem in itself.)

> 3) For unknown reason these sockets then remain open. In the morning
> when people start their workstation again we therefor not only get a
> lot of these messages again but often the nfs-server does not proberly
> work any more. Restarting the nfs-daemon is a workaround.

Hm, thanks.

--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html