netdev - RE: [PATCH v3] Make the pr_*() family of macros in kernel.h complete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:11:14 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 <Emilian.Medve@...escale.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	i2c@...sensors.org, linux-omap-open-source@...ux.omap.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] Make the pr_*() family of macros in kernel.h
	complete

On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 11:44 -0700, Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 wrote:
> First, this patch doesn't have the trailing "\n" problem that one had.

I expect all the kernel logging functions to be
overhauled eventually.

I'd prefer a mechanism that somehow supports
identifying complete messages.  I think the new
pr_<level> functions are not particularly useful
without a mechanism to avoid or identify multiple
processors or threads interleaving partial in-progress
multiple statement messages.

I've got a very large patch series that converts _all_
the current single line messages that use KERN_<level>
to pr_<level> and identifies, prefixes and postfixes
the rest of the multiple source line messages.

At some point, sooner or later, the logging functions
will be improved.  Apparently, more likely later.

cheers, Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html