netdev - Re: [PATCH] include listenq max/backlog in tcp_info and related reports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:44:58 -0400
From:	John Heffner <jheffner@....edu>
To:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include listenq max/backlog in tcp_info and related	reports
 - correct version/signorder

Rick Jones wrote:
> John Heffner wrote:
>> Any reason you're overloading tcpi_unacked and tcpi_sacked?  It seems 
>> that setting idiag_rqueue and idiag_wqueue are sufficient.
> 
> Different fields for different structures.   The tcp_info struct doesn't 
> have the idiag_mumble, so to get the two values shown in /proc/net/tcp I 
> use tcpi_unacked and tcpi_sacked.
> 
> For the INET_DIAG_INFO stuff the idiag_mumble fields are used and that 
> then covers ss.

Maybe I'm missing something.  get_tcp[46]_sock() does not use struct 
tcp_info.  The only way I see using this is by doing 
getsockopt(TCP_INFO) on your listen socket.  Is this the intention?

   -John

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html