netdev - Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:26:53 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:49:09AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The standard way to undo connect is to use AF_UNSPEC. Code to handle
> > that for dgram sockets is there. It's the same code for v4 and v6.
> 
> I quoted the standard and it does not say anything about AF_UNSPEC.  So
> you cannot simply make such broad statements.

Ok "standard" was perhaps a poor choice of words.

AF_UNSPEC used to be introduced long ago by Alan based on some early 
POSIX draft iirc.

Also incidentially it's a null address:

include/linux/socket.h:#define AF_UNSPEC        0

> But the spec calls for a "null address" to be used and that's in my
> understanding something different from using AF_UNSPEC.

memset(&sockaddr, 0, sizeof(sockaddr)) should give you AF_UNSPEC

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html