lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:48:58 -0700 From: lm@...mover.com (Larry McVoy) To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@...mover.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, davem@...emloft.net, wscott@...mover.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: tcp bw in 2.6 Isn't this something so straightforward that you would have tests for it? This is the basic FTP server loop, doesn't someone have a big machine with 10gig cards and test that sending/recving data doesn't regress? > Sounds like a bug to me, modulo the above caveat of making sure that it's > not some hw/driver/switch kind of difference. Pretty unlikely given that we've changed the switch, the card works fine in the other direction, and I'm 95% sure that we used to get better perf before we switched to a more recent kernel. I'll try and find some other gig ether cards and try them. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists