netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/10] Preparatory refactoring part 2.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:19:07 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@...ooh.org>
CC:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] Preparatory refactoring part 2.

Corey Hickey wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>> +static void sfq_destroy(struct Qdisc *sch)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct sfq_sched_data *q = qdisc_priv(sch);
>>> +    sfq_q_destroy(q);
>>> +}
>>
>>
>> It does look pointless, after applying all patches sfq_destroy still
>> remains a simply wrapper around sfq_q_destroy.
> 
> 
> It does remain a wrapper, but both functions are used. It doesn't have
> to be this way, but I wanted to avoid duplicating code and I didn't see
> a better layout.
> 
> sfq_q_destroy is used in sfq_q_init if a kcalloc fails. sfq_q_init knows
> nothing about "struct Qdisc *sch", so it can't call sfq_destroy.

Thats fine, I didn't realize it was used without the struct Qdisc *
context. Changing sfq_destroy to sfq_q_destroy(qdisc_priv(sch));
would be a bit nicer though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html