lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:00:10 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	dlstevens@...ibm.com, xemul@...nvz.org, devel@...nvz.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][NETNS] Make ifindex generation per-namespace

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:43:58 -0600
>
>> David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Sorry if this is a dumb question, but what is the model you intend for
>> > SNMP? Do you want each namespace to be its own virtual machine with
>> > its own, separate MIB?
>> 
>> Each network namespace appears to user space as a completely separate
>> network stack.  So yes a separate instance of the MIB is appropriate.
>
> We don't think you can validly do that, as David tried to explain.
>
> The interface indexes are visible remotely to remote SNMP querying
> applications.  They have to be unique within the physical system.

I think figuring out what we are doing with SNMP is not any harder
or easier then any other user space interface, and like I said I
don't think we are ready yet.

>From the perspective of monitoring network namespaces make the entire
system looks more like a cluster then it does a single machine, and
that is how I would look at portraying the system to SNMP if I had to
do that work today.  A switch with a bunch of different machines 
behind it.  Especially in the context of container migration this
becomes an attractive model.

Regardless it is early yet and there is plenty of time to revisit this
after we solved the easier and less controversial problems.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ