[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:40:10 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [IPSEC] esp: Remove NAT-T checksum invalidation for BEET
[IPSEC] esp: Remove NAT-T checksum invalidation for BEET
I pointed this out back when this patch was first proposed but it looks like
it got lost along the way.
The checksum only needs to be ignored for NAT-T in transport mode where
we lose the original inner addresses due to NAT. With BEET the inner
addresses will be intact so the checksum remains valid.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
---
net/ipv4/esp4.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
index 452910d..1af332d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
@@ -261,8 +261,7 @@ static int esp_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
* as per draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-06,
* section 3.1.2
*/
- if (x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT ||
- x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_BEET)
+ if (x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT)
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists