netdev - Re: Regression in net-2.6.24?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:50:59 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	takano@...-inc.co.jp, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, mchan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: Regression in net-2.6.24?

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:31:49 -0700
> 
> > You don't need to re-read the status register and process the PHY irq's inside loop.
> > Try this:
> 
> Are you sure?  What if a PHY interrupt comes in during the loop?

The interrupt is level triggered, and will rearm.

> 
> I'm just preserving the semantics of the driver when ->poll()
> is invoked multiple times per interrupt.
> 
> And I think preserving that makes sense while we're purely
> trying to fix this bug, so we don't add some new ones.


-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html