| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:46:36 +0200 From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Cc: rick.jones2@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update function names in /proc/net/tcp documentation Hi Herbert, On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:09:12 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote: > > > >> inet_diag is the preferred interface. > > > > How does it work? Is there some documentation available? I see > > net/ipv4/inet_diag.c but I have no idea how to use it. > > Have a look at the iproute package. It contains the ss command > which provides a command-line interface to it. > > Of course it's also a good example of how you can access it from > C. The Debian pidentd package has also been patched to use this > interface. Thanks for the information. Now I'm worried that most people use netstat and not ss, while it seems that netstat doesn't have tcp_diag support. Would it make sense to add tcp_diag support to netstat? Or should we simply invite system admins to switch from netstat to ss (maybe by adding a netstat-like formatting option)? Not that I am skilled enough in this area to do either myself anyway (let alone the lack of time), but I'm curious what the correct approach would be. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists